Puckdropper
Maybe it's to slow down mining efforts?
Mon Jun 20, 2022 12:55am

But honestly, the miners are going to just use cards that don't have that anti-feature. (Or attach a resistor to the VGA pins for a cheap fix.)

If it is to cover a bug, why not pretend you have a standard resolution monitor attached, like 1024x768? When a new monitor appears, update the system to the new size like you have to anyway.

I could see it being done as a security feature, but then why can't I turn it off?

The little headless device worked, that was another $10 I didn't expect to spend. :-(

  • Oof... that's an awful "feature". - Erik_, Mon Jun 13 2022 12:57pm
    What could even be the reasoning for it? Are there really that many PCs that might accidentally be turned on without someone knowing about it that they require something like that? Unless it's a cheap way to cover a bug or something. Like, if the monitor isn't present at boot, plugging one in after... more
    • Maybe it's to slow down mining efforts?- Puckdropper, Mon Jun 20 2022 12:55am
      • On the bright side, at least it was only $10! - Erik_, Thu Jun 23 2022 1:11am
        I didn't consider miners. That could be a possibility though I thought they used high end graphics cards to mine? If the code is burned into the BIOS ROM and they didn't have time to fix the bug correctly before the batches were made, it might have been the quickest dirtiest fix they could do to hide... more
        • It's the dumbest anti-feature I can think of - Puckdropper, Sat Jun 25 2022 11:54pm
          I just can't fathom why they'd do that. If it was security, have a method to ENABLE it in the BIOS. I get so tired of having to ask someone's permission to do something. "Can I use my PC as a headless low stress server?" "NO, it's a PC not a server." "Here, let me install the equivalent to piping... more
"Forces act when not restrained" - Puckdropper